More than 3,000 University of California faculty members are pressing the system to bring back the SAT and ACT after saying too many freshmen are arriving unready for college math.
Quick Take
- University of California faculty have signed two open letters calling for standardized testing to return.
- The STEM letter says testing is a “critical baseline” for math readiness in university-level STEM work.
- Faculty say some instructors now must reteach middle school math in college classrooms.
- UC leaders are still reviewing the issue, with a possible decision pushed out to 2027.
Faculty Push Back Against Lower Standards
University of California professors are making a blunt case that the system’s test-free admissions model is not working as promised. Reporting says more than 2,300 STEM faculty signed one letter, while about 900 faculty in humanities, social sciences, and professional fields backed a second letter. The letters argue that a common test score gives schools one clear outside measure of student readiness, instead of relying only on uneven grades and course choices.
The strongest concern from the faculty side is simple: some students are arriving without the math skills needed for first-year work. A Wall Street Journal report quoted the letter saying, “We now observe preparation gaps so severe that instructors must reteach middle school mathematics.” KQED reported that the STEM letter called SAT and ACT math scores a “critical baseline” and a “common external check” for core fluency.
Why the Debate Spread Beyond Math Departments
This fight did not stay inside the engineering and math buildings. Inside Higher Ed reported that the broader faculty effort included roughly 900 additional signers from humanities, social sciences, and professional schools, who pushed for reading and writing measures too. That detail matters because it shows the complaint is not just one department asking for more screening. It is a wider faculty warning that basic academic skills are slipping across subjects, not only in technical majors.
The public record also shows that faculty concern reached UC decision-makers fast. UC has already moved into a formal review process, and reporting says any change would not take effect before fall 2028. That long delay will frustrate readers who think standards should be restored now, but it also shows the system has not ignored the issue. It has chosen to study it slowly, which is often how big university bureaucracies move.
What UC Says, and What It Has Not Shown
UC’s defenders have a familiar answer: the system adopted its test-blind policy to improve equity and widen access. KQED reported that the current admissions approach is meant to reduce racial and socioeconomic gaps, and that campus leaders are weighing those goals against classroom readiness. Other coverage points to pandemic learning loss, grade inflation, and even artificial intelligence as possible reasons students seem less prepared, which weakens any claim that test-optional admissions alone caused the problem.
The great standardized testing experiment has officially failed.
Over 1400 professors at the University of California are aggressively demanding the return of the SAT and ACT.
The test blind admissions policy implemented in 2020 has created an absolute academic disaster.… pic.twitter.com/ADKKWGAFdE
— Ajit – Stocks | Business | AI | Tech | Geopolitics (@Anvayance) August 7, 2026
What UC has not publicly shown, at least in the material provided here, is a clean data study proving that its current admissions model works better than standardized tests for first-year success. The strongest evidence in the record is faculty testimony, letter counts, and reported classroom experience, not a full campus-by-campus validity analysis. That leaves the core policy question open: whether UC wants to keep betting on holistic review, or restore a test that faculty say gives them a clearer signal.
Sources:
thegatewaypundit.com, youtube.com, latimes.com, insidehighered.com, berkeleyside.org


























